fix: accept scoped blacklist runtime context

crates/fidc-core/src/platform_strategy_spec.rs

@@ -336,6 +336,15 @@ pub struct StrategyRiskPolicySpec {
         alias = "blacklist"
     )]
     pub blacklisted_symbols: Vec<String>,
+    /// Account- and strategy-scoped blacklist facts are injected by the
+    /// trading platform before runtime execution. They are typed here so the
+    /// shared contract validator accepts the context without silently
+    /// discarding malformed values; the trading risk layer applies the
+    /// account/strategy match with the actual execution identity.
+    #[serde(default, alias = "accountBlacklistedInstruments")]
+    pub account_blacklisted_instruments: BTreeMap<String, BTreeSet<String>>,
+    #[serde(default, alias = "strategyBlacklistedInstruments")]
+    pub strategy_blacklisted_instruments: BTreeMap<String, BTreeSet<String>>,
     #[serde(
         default,
         alias = "volume_limit_enabled",
@@ -675,8 +684,14 @@ const STRATEGY_ALIAS_GROUPS: &[(&str, &[&str])] = &[
     ("matchingType", &["matching_type"]),
     ("slippageModel", &["slippage_model"]),
     ("slippageValue", &["slippage_value"]),
-    ("slippageImpactCoefficient", &["slippage_impact_coefficient"]),
+    (
-    ("slippageVolatilityCoefficient", &["slippage_volatility_coefficient"]),
+        "slippageImpactCoefficient",
+        &["slippage_impact_coefficient"],
+    ),
+    (
+        "slippageVolatilityCoefficient",
+        &["slippage_volatility_coefficient"],
+    ),
     (
         "slippageMaxValue",
         &["slippage_max_value", "slippage_max_rate"],
@@ -688,7 +703,10 @@ const STRATEGY_ALIAS_GROUPS: &[(&str, &[&str])] = &[
     ),
     ("transferFeeRate", &["transfer_fee_rate", "transferFeeRate"]),
     ("stampTaxRate", &["stamp_tax_rate"]),
-    ("stampTaxRateBeforeChange", &["stamp_tax_rate_before_change"]),
+    (
+        "stampTaxRateBeforeChange",
+        &["stamp_tax_rate_before_change"],
+    ),
     ("stampTaxRateAfterChange", &["stamp_tax_rate_after_change"]),
     ("stampTaxChangeDate", &["stamp_tax_change_date"]),
     ("volumeLimit", &["volume_limit"]),
@@ -1080,6 +1098,10 @@ pub fn validate_strategy_risk_policy_fields(value: &Value) -> Result<(), String>
         "blacklistedInstruments",
         "blacklisted_instruments",
         "blacklist",
+        "accountBlacklistedInstruments",
+        "account_blacklisted_instruments",
+        "strategyBlacklistedInstruments",
+        "strategy_blacklisted_instruments",
         // Legacy execution aliases are accepted by StrategyExecutionSpec and
         // normalized into the same shared switches.
         "volumeLimit",
@@ -1295,18 +1317,12 @@ fn apply_risk_policy_overrides(
     let Some(policy) = policy else {
         return Ok(());
     };
-    let max_order_quantity = valid_positive_limit(
+    let max_order_quantity =
-        policy.max_order_quantity,
+        valid_positive_limit(policy.max_order_quantity, "riskPolicy.maxOrderQuantity")?;
-        "riskPolicy.maxOrderQuantity",
+    let max_order_notional =
-    )?;
+        valid_positive_limit(policy.max_order_notional, "riskPolicy.maxOrderNotional")?;
-    let max_order_notional = valid_positive_limit(
+    let max_symbol_position =
-        policy.max_order_notional,
+        valid_positive_limit(policy.max_symbol_position, "riskPolicy.maxSymbolPosition")?;
-        "riskPolicy.maxOrderNotional",
-    )?;
-    let max_symbol_position = valid_positive_limit(
-        policy.max_symbol_position,
-        "riskPolicy.maxSymbolPosition",
-    )?;
     if let Some(value) = max_order_quantity {
         cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.max_order_quantity = value;
     }
@@ -3433,9 +3449,18 @@ mod tests {
         );
         assert!(cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.volume_limit_enabled);
         assert!(cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.liquidity_limit_enabled);
-        assert_eq!(cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.max_order_quantity, 8000.0);
+        assert_eq!(
-        assert_eq!(cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.max_order_notional, 2_000_000.0);
+            cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.max_order_quantity,
-        assert_eq!(cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.max_symbol_position, 12_000.0);
+            8000.0
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.max_order_notional,
+            2_000_000.0
+        );
+        assert_eq!(
+            cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.max_symbol_position,
+            12_000.0
+        );
         assert!((cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.volume_percent - 0.25).abs() < 1e-12);
         assert_eq!(
             cfg.risk_config
@@ -3647,6 +3672,25 @@ mod tests {
         assert_eq!(cfg.risk_config.trading_constraints.minimum_commission, 5.0);
     }
 
+    #[test]
+    fn accepts_scoped_blacklist_context_in_runtime_risk_policy() {
+        let spec = serde_json::json!({
+            "execution": {
+                "riskPolicy": {
+                    "account_blacklisted_instruments": {
+                        "2075773": ["000001.SZ"]
+                    },
+                    "strategyBlacklistedInstruments": {
+                        "live-gt-2075773-20260829": ["600000.SH"]
+                    }
+                }
+            }
+        });
+
+        platform_expr_config_from_value("105", "932000.CSI", &spec)
+            .expect("scoped blacklist context is part of the shared runtime contract");
+    }
+
     #[test]
     fn rejects_conflicting_risk_policy_alias_values() {
         let bool_conflict = serde_json::json!({